<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/2.1.3" -->
<rss version="2.0" 
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/">
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Pack Up this Popsicle Stand</title>
	<link>http://www.alattimore.com/archives/85</link>
	<description>Ranting about the state of the Future for over 3 years.</description>
	<pubDate>Thu, 09 Sep 2010 13:12:48 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.1.3</generator>

	<item>
		<title>By: SteveGould</title>
		<link>http://www.alattimore.com/archives/85#comment-2</link>
		<author>SteveGould</author>
		<pubDate>Fri, 09 May 2003 01:27:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.alattimore.com/archives/85#comment-2</guid>
					<description>Unfortunately, what there survey probably didn\'t account for was the vast amount of near future SF that people read that =isn\'t= marketed as SF including Chrichton, some of that madcap guy Tom Clancy, and lots of Military SF that has technology elements not implemented yet.

I strongly suspect that there are lots of =general  readership= who would read SF if given the right author without the packaging that predisposes them to reject it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Unfortunately, what there survey probably didn\&#8217;t account for was the vast amount of near future SF that people read that =isn\&#8217;t= marketed as SF including Chrichton, some of that madcap guy Tom Clancy, and lots of Military SF that has technology elements not implemented yet.</p>
<p>I strongly suspect that there are lots of =general  readership= who would read SF if given the right author without the packaging that predisposes them to reject it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
</channel>
</rss>
